Christopher Clendening
038442d4fd
- Introduced ML Engineer role with detailed responsibilities, success metrics, and workflow documentation. - Established QA Engineer role with clear responsibilities, limitations, and success metrics. - Created structured onboarding files for both roles, including README, ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES, WORKFLOW, and SUCCESS_METRICS. - Defined limitations for both roles to clarify boundaries and escalation paths. - Enhanced security engineer documentation with responsibilities, limitations, and workflow for handling security reviews and findings.
1.3 KiB
Security Engineer — Memory
This role's own accumulated context: recurring finding patterns per project, past contested-hold
outcomes, and judgment calls on ambiguous policy applications. Not automatically shared with
other roles — see ../../MEMORY.md on the two-tier memory system. Promote anything company-wide
to ../../memory/lessons-learned.md instead of leaving it siloed here.
Recurring finding patterns
None recorded yet. When the same category of finding shows up repeatedly in one project or
from one role (e.g. repeated secret-handling mistakes), record it here — and add it to
../../memory/lessons-learned.md if it's a company-wide pattern worth catching earlier via
../../SECURITY.md itself.
Contested holds
None recorded yet.
### YYYY-MM-DD — <short title>
<what was contested, and the resolution>
**Outcome:** hold upheld / hold lifted — <why>
Policy judgment calls
None recorded yet. Notes on how an ambiguous ../../SECURITY.md policy question was actually
resolved in practice, so the next similar case doesn't have to be re-reasoned from scratch — and
so genuinely recurring ambiguity surfaces as a signal the policy doc itself needs updating.
Format for new entries
### YYYY-MM-DD — <short title>
<the observation>
**Why it matters:** <what this changes about how you review going forward>