- Create SECURITY.md to outline security policies and practices. - Establish WORKFLOW.md detailing the project lifecycle from planning to retrospective. - Introduce decision log structure in decisions/README.md for tracking architecture decisions. - Document Project Manager role with responsibilities, limitations, and operational workflows. - Implement templates for ADRs, bugs, meetings, projects, retrospectives, RFCs, roadmaps, and sprints. - Set up memory logs for architecture and company-wide lessons learned. - Define terminology for consistent understanding across the organization.
4.4 KiB
PLANE.md
Status: Plane is not yet deployed. It's planned for the Portainer-managed monolith. This document is written as policy that takes effect the day the instance comes online — treat it as authoritative for how Plane will be used, not a proposal to debate later. Once deployed, replace the
<PLANE_URL>and<WORKSPACE>placeholders below and remove this notice.
Plane is the single source of truth for epics, stories, tasks, sprints, and priorities. Nothing
in this repository duplicates that state — see the source-of-truth table in COMPANY.md. If
you're looking for "what's currently in progress," the answer is in Plane, not in a Markdown
file.
Instance
- URL:
<PLANE_URL> - Workspace:
<WORKSPACE> - Every AI employee has its own Plane account per
ORGANIZATION.md— no shared API token.
Hierarchy
Epic
└── Story
└── Task
- Epic — created only by the CEO, and only from a Founder-approved plan (
FOUNDER.md). Represents a full unit of approved strategic direction (e.g. "LLM Training Suite"). - Story — created by the Project Manager, breaking an Epic into a coherent slice of work (e.g. "Dataset Upload").
- Task — created by the Project Manager, the actual unit of assignable work (e.g. "Create Upload API"). Tasks are what engineers claim and close.
Status flow
Matches the semantic flow in WORKFLOW.md:
Backlog → Todo → In Progress → In Review → QA → Done
▲ │
└──────── Reopened ────┘
Configure these as the Task-level statuses in Plane. Stories and Epics track completion by roll-up of their child Tasks/Stories — don't hand-manage Story/Epic status independently of their children.
Labels
Use labels for cross-cutting concerns that don't fit the Epic/Story/Task hierarchy:
- Role labels (
backend,frontend,ml,qa,security,devops,docs) for filtering by discipline, in addition to the Task's actual assignee. blocked— anything the Project Manager needs to actively watch and unstick.security-hold— set by the Security Engineer; only the Security Engineer or Founder clears it (seeEMPLOYEE_HANDBOOK.mddisagreement resolution).needs-adr— flagged by the Architect when a Task's implementation implies a decision that should be recorded perDECISIONS.mdbefore proceeding.
Priority
Set at the Epic level by the CEO and inherited downward unless the Project Manager has a specific reason to override at the Story/Task level (e.g. a blocking dependency). Priority changes on approved Epics still respect the approval gate for anything that changes scope — reordering already-approved work does not require a new Founder approval; adding new scope does.
Assignment
The Project Manager assigns Tasks to the engineering role best suited to them, using the role labels above as a guide. Engineers may also self-claim unassigned Tasks from the active sprint's Todo column — the Project Manager should notice and confirm the claim rather than silently allowing parallel claims on the same Task.
Sprints
- Opened and closed by the Project Manager (
employees/project-manager/WORKFLOW.mdhas the operational detail). - Scoped from Stories the CEO has already prioritized — a sprint should not contain Stories pulled from an un-prioritized backlog.
- Burndown and velocity live in Plane's own reporting. Don't recreate a burndown chart in Markdown; if you need a snapshot for a retrospective, link to the Plane view.
Meetings
Plane's built-in activity feed is the primary record of what happened. Where a synchronous
planning or retro session needs its own notes, use templates/MEETING.md or
templates/RETROSPECTIVE.md and link the resulting doc from the relevant Epic/Story in Plane —
don't let meeting notes live disconnected from the work they're about.
Why no custom dashboard
Because every employee has their own identity (ORGANIZATION.md), Plane's built-in activity
history already tells the full story on its own — Epic → Story → Task → Commit → PR → Review →
QA reject → fix → QA pass → Story closes — without a bespoke reporting layer. Resist the urge to
build one; if Plane's native views genuinely can't answer a question, that's a Plane
configuration problem to solve, not a reason to build a parallel tracker.