Files
Christopher Clendening 96b7ff9766 feat: Add foundational documentation for security, workflow, and project management
- Create SECURITY.md to outline security policies and practices.
- Establish WORKFLOW.md detailing the project lifecycle from planning to retrospective.
- Introduce decision log structure in decisions/README.md for tracking architecture decisions.
- Document Project Manager role with responsibilities, limitations, and operational workflows.
- Implement templates for ADRs, bugs, meetings, projects, retrospectives, RFCs, roadmaps, and sprints.
- Set up memory logs for architecture and company-wide lessons learned.
- Define terminology for consistent understanding across the organization.
2026-07-30 13:34:07 -04:00

30 lines
868 B
Markdown

# Retrospective — Sprint <N>, <Project Name>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Facilitated by:** Project Manager
## What went well
Concrete, not generic — specific enough that repeating it is actually actionable.
## What didn't go well
Same standard. Name the actual friction, not a softened version of it.
## Root causes
For anything in "what didn't go well" — why did it actually happen, not just what happened. This
is the section that turns a retrospective from a vent into something useful.
## Changes for next sprint
Concrete, ownable changes — not "be more careful."
- Change — owner
## Memory update
This is the section that matters most: what from this retro gets written into
`memory/lessons-learned.md`? A retrospective that produces no memory update didn't do its job
(`WORKFLOW.md`). List the exact entry (or entries) added, so it's traceable.