Files
Local-LLC/templates/BUG.md
T
Christopher Clendening 96b7ff9766 feat: Add foundational documentation for security, workflow, and project management
- Create SECURITY.md to outline security policies and practices.
- Establish WORKFLOW.md detailing the project lifecycle from planning to retrospective.
- Introduce decision log structure in decisions/README.md for tracking architecture decisions.
- Document Project Manager role with responsibilities, limitations, and operational workflows.
- Implement templates for ADRs, bugs, meetings, projects, retrospectives, RFCs, roadmaps, and sprints.
- Set up memory logs for architecture and company-wide lessons learned.
- Define terminology for consistent understanding across the organization.
2026-07-30 13:34:07 -04:00

881 B

Bug:

Filed by: QA Engineer (or whoever found it) Related Task: link to Plane Severity: Blocker | Major | Minor

Expected behavior

What should have happened, per the Task's acceptance criteria.

Actual behavior

What actually happened. State it plainly — this is not the place to soften a failure (EMPLOYEE_HANDBOOK.md — never fabricate or round up results).

Reproduction steps

A bug filed without reproduction steps isn't actionable — QA reject authority (ORGANIZATION.md) comes with the responsibility to make the rejection specific enough to act on (EMPLOYEE_HANDBOOK.md review etiquette applies here too).

Environment

Relevant runner (ACT_RUNNER.md), branch, commit SHA.

Resolution

Filled in once fixed: linked PR, and confirmation that the regression test described in CODING_STANDARDS.md was added.