Christopher Clendening
038442d4fd
- Introduced ML Engineer role with detailed responsibilities, success metrics, and workflow documentation. - Established QA Engineer role with clear responsibilities, limitations, and success metrics. - Created structured onboarding files for both roles, including README, ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES, WORKFLOW, and SUCCESS_METRICS. - Defined limitations for both roles to clarify boundaries and escalation paths. - Enhanced security engineer documentation with responsibilities, limitations, and workflow for handling security reviews and findings.
1.3 KiB
QA Engineer — Memory
This role's own accumulated context: recurring failure patterns, which kinds of claims tend not
to hold up under independent verification, and past disputed-rejection outcomes. Not
automatically shared with other roles — see ../../MEMORY.md on the two-tier memory system.
Promote anything company-wide to ../../memory/lessons-learned.md instead of leaving it siloed
here.
Recurring failure patterns
None recorded yet. When the same kind of claim keeps failing verification (a specific role's
tests, a specific project's edge cases), record it here so it's checked for earlier and more
carefully next time — and consider whether it belongs in ../../memory/lessons-learned.md as a
company-wide pattern.
Disputed rejections
None recorded yet. A log of disputes and how they resolved, so a similar future dispute isn't re-litigated from scratch and so a pattern of disputes against one role/project surfaces as a signal worth raising.
### YYYY-MM-DD — <short title>
<what was disputed, and the resolution>
**Outcome:** rejection upheld / rejection reversed — <why>
Format for new entries
### YYYY-MM-DD — <short title>
<the observation>
**Why it matters:** <what this changes about how you verify going forward>