# Bug: <short title>

**Filed by:** QA Engineer (or whoever found it)
**Related Task:** link to Plane
**Severity:** Blocker | Major | Minor

## Expected behavior

What should have happened, per the Task's acceptance criteria.

## Actual behavior

What actually happened. State it plainly — this is not the place to soften a failure
(`EMPLOYEE_HANDBOOK.md` — never fabricate or round up results).

## Reproduction steps

1.
2.
3.

A bug filed without reproduction steps isn't actionable — QA reject authority
(`ORGANIZATION.md`) comes with the responsibility to make the rejection specific enough to act
on (`EMPLOYEE_HANDBOOK.md` review etiquette applies here too).

## Environment

Relevant runner (`ACT_RUNNER.md`), branch, commit SHA.

## Resolution

Filled in once fixed: linked PR, and confirmation that the regression test described in
`CODING_STANDARDS.md` was added.